Social Engineering Our Way To The Perfect World
By: Doug Busselman, Executive Vice President
Perhaps it has something to do with these types of stories that cause us to doubt the hoax of climate change. Whether it’s advocates like Paul McCartney or elected representatives like Congressmen Waxman and Markey – the end result they would like us to buy in on, to protect Mother Earth, is an agenda that they maintain would be what they see as being the way things ought to be.
We all need to fall in line and live our lives the way that these fortunately-visionary people see as being the correct way for us all to live.
Not having livestock and meat products will make a better world, according to Mr. McCartney and paying a significantly higher price for carbon-based fuels would be the solution of Waxman-Markey.
Individual freedom and outcomes not swayed by governmentally-manipulated influences can’t achieve the desired results of changing the world to fit their design so they need to rely on the force of government control.
As the general public is made more aware of these blatant examples of folly, we hope that the ability to see through to the real purpose of Climate Change advocates will cause the general public to question whether global warming (if it is taking place) has anything to do with the activities carried out by man. With the expansion of the examples of ideas we’re supposed to swallow hook-line-and-sinker we hope we’re getting to the tipping point of people recognizing this “science” for what it is…
Perhaps it has something to do with these types of stories that cause us to doubt the hoax of climate change. Whether it’s advocates like Paul McCartney or elected representatives like Congressmen Waxman and Markey – the end result they would like us to buy in on, to protect Mother Earth, is an agenda that they maintain would be what they see as being the way things ought to be.
We all need to fall in line and live our lives the way that these fortunately-visionary people see as being the correct way for us all to live.
Not having livestock and meat products will make a better world, according to Mr. McCartney and paying a significantly higher price for carbon-based fuels would be the solution of Waxman-Markey.
Individual freedom and outcomes not swayed by governmentally-manipulated influences can’t achieve the desired results of changing the world to fit their design so they need to rely on the force of government control.
As the general public is made more aware of these blatant examples of folly, we hope that the ability to see through to the real purpose of Climate Change advocates will cause the general public to question whether global warming (if it is taking place) has anything to do with the activities carried out by man. With the expansion of the examples of ideas we’re supposed to swallow hook-line-and-sinker we hope we’re getting to the tipping point of people recognizing this “science” for what it is…

Comments