Congress Votes To Pass Climate Change -- Another Reason For Preparing For Election 2010
By: Doug Busselman, Executive Vice President
Many by now have already shared the link to take you to Kimberly Strassel’s Wall Street Journal article that shared the actions being taken by elected officials in Australia. If you haven’t seen the article it’s a great read, presenting some details we might not have gotten from the media supporters for the Waxman-Markey Climate Change Cap & Tax legislation.
In using this link and going to the article, I also clicked through to read the comments that have been sent in by readers.
We also have just learned that the U.S. House voted 219 to 212 in favor of passage for the Cap & Tax proposal. Nevada's two Democratic representatives, Congresswoman Berkley and Congresswoman Titus voted in support of the bill. Congressman Heller voted against passage.
I believe that the scientific theory of climate change, caused by man’s actions is a total farce presented to us by politicians who want another excuse to expand government control over us and a scientific community that can’t wait for the next load of government funding to arrive for whatever else they might invent as a crisis.
Coming from this perspective, those readers who agree with my point of view, I see as being brilliant observers of the truth. Those who disagree with my side are all part of the problem.
Seems like Climate Change and the hosts of other things coming down from Washington, D.C. all have the common point of concern that fit into the theme of “Do you want a growing government to expend more control – or would you prefer to have government not expand and find its way back to the constraints of the responsibilities spelled out in the U.S. Constitution?”
We’re supposed to believe that the “change” we elected in 2008 is running the show and growing a bigger government to take care of us is the course that was set with those vote outcomes.
If that is the case, bringing that monster down needs to be our number 1 priority as we prepare for November of 2010. Going house to house, rural driveway to rural driveway, those who believe in the merits of responsible government constraint need to work – electing those who agree and getting rid of those who vote for more governmental chains.
Many by now have already shared the link to take you to Kimberly Strassel’s Wall Street Journal article that shared the actions being taken by elected officials in Australia. If you haven’t seen the article it’s a great read, presenting some details we might not have gotten from the media supporters for the Waxman-Markey Climate Change Cap & Tax legislation.
In using this link and going to the article, I also clicked through to read the comments that have been sent in by readers.
We also have just learned that the U.S. House voted 219 to 212 in favor of passage for the Cap & Tax proposal. Nevada's two Democratic representatives, Congresswoman Berkley and Congresswoman Titus voted in support of the bill. Congressman Heller voted against passage.
I believe that the scientific theory of climate change, caused by man’s actions is a total farce presented to us by politicians who want another excuse to expand government control over us and a scientific community that can’t wait for the next load of government funding to arrive for whatever else they might invent as a crisis.
Coming from this perspective, those readers who agree with my point of view, I see as being brilliant observers of the truth. Those who disagree with my side are all part of the problem.
Seems like Climate Change and the hosts of other things coming down from Washington, D.C. all have the common point of concern that fit into the theme of “Do you want a growing government to expend more control – or would you prefer to have government not expand and find its way back to the constraints of the responsibilities spelled out in the U.S. Constitution?”
We’re supposed to believe that the “change” we elected in 2008 is running the show and growing a bigger government to take care of us is the course that was set with those vote outcomes.
If that is the case, bringing that monster down needs to be our number 1 priority as we prepare for November of 2010. Going house to house, rural driveway to rural driveway, those who believe in the merits of responsible government constraint need to work – electing those who agree and getting rid of those who vote for more governmental chains.
Posted by Doug Busselman at 6/26/2009 3:47 PM 
Categories: Climate Change
Tags: Elections 2010 Global Warming Congress
Categories: Climate Change
Tags: Elections 2010 Global Warming Congress
Comments