Federal Government Positions For Assault Against Americans
By: Doug Busselman, Executive Vice President
It was a busy day in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday with both the U.S. Senate and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) getting themselves in position for the work of forcing our energy costs higher using the excuses of Climate Change and carbon-dioxide-as-pollution. Highlighted here, we see that the bureaucratic action will probably advance ahead of lawmakers passing a law to accomplish the objective of inflicting financial damage for carbon-linked energy. Then it will only be a question of which entity of federal government excess can top the other in pursing the agenda of the greatest burden possible.
In addition to the rules that EPA has in mind for penalizing carbon emissions, other considered actions also propose even greater expanse of command and control.
The biggest challenge is attempting how to install meaningful protection from our government’s actions. Defeat of the Senate proposal (however it finally ends up) is one key priority as is giving full attention to presenting arguments on how the regulatory over-reach will accomplish little more than negatively affecting our collective bottom-line.
It was a busy day in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday with both the U.S. Senate and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) getting themselves in position for the work of forcing our energy costs higher using the excuses of Climate Change and carbon-dioxide-as-pollution. Highlighted here, we see that the bureaucratic action will probably advance ahead of lawmakers passing a law to accomplish the objective of inflicting financial damage for carbon-linked energy. Then it will only be a question of which entity of federal government excess can top the other in pursing the agenda of the greatest burden possible.
In addition to the rules that EPA has in mind for penalizing carbon emissions, other considered actions also propose even greater expanse of command and control.
The biggest challenge is attempting how to install meaningful protection from our government’s actions. Defeat of the Senate proposal (however it finally ends up) is one key priority as is giving full attention to presenting arguments on how the regulatory over-reach will accomplish little more than negatively affecting our collective bottom-line.

Comments