Like We Thought – Global Warming Summit Will Defeat Its Own Purpose
the points madeBy: Doug Busselman, Executive Vice President
Several days ago we shared the idea that when international advocates for reducing the impact of carbon on our atmosphere get together in Copenhagen they will be creating what they want to punish the rest of the world for doing – generating a huge carbon footprint. Thanks to this report from Fox News we see that one solution to reducing carbon’s ravages is to keep our world leaders home. Saving the planet from the theory of man-made climate change takes a lot of energy for those who are doing the saving – which makes you wonder what good might come from not doing anything…
The United Nations is credited with an estimate that the 12-day conference will create 40,584 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, roughly the same amount as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006. (There were no details over whether conflicting estimates were prevented from being included for possible consideration.)
Although the hoopla taking us into the Denmark conference is of the expected create-a-crisis-expand-government-control, we see plenty of evidence to identify that beyond wasting a lot of energy and laying the ground work for government forcing solutions on us – not much else will come to benefit the crisis that the summit is being held to change. As The Heritage Foundation’s President, Edwin J. Feulner points out in this observation the organized system for tearing down the economy of the United States under the guise of saving the planet is more of the same without any real accomplishment on an international basis.
Of course tearing down the United States economy is really what this hoax is all about – paying those doing the destruction in the process. Scientist and politicians always appreciate more funding and in this case, on an international basis, one hand washes the other. Science gives license to government to overreach in expanding policy intrusion into all aspects of our lives. In return the enterprise of scientific study and “research” into climate change gets funded by government.
In the end, the points made by Ben Lieberman are absolutely correct that the U.S. should stay out of the accord, if one is to come from the Copenhagen session.
Several days ago we shared the idea that when international advocates for reducing the impact of carbon on our atmosphere get together in Copenhagen they will be creating what they want to punish the rest of the world for doing – generating a huge carbon footprint. Thanks to this report from Fox News we see that one solution to reducing carbon’s ravages is to keep our world leaders home. Saving the planet from the theory of man-made climate change takes a lot of energy for those who are doing the saving – which makes you wonder what good might come from not doing anything…
The United Nations is credited with an estimate that the 12-day conference will create 40,584 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, roughly the same amount as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006. (There were no details over whether conflicting estimates were prevented from being included for possible consideration.)
Although the hoopla taking us into the Denmark conference is of the expected create-a-crisis-expand-government-control, we see plenty of evidence to identify that beyond wasting a lot of energy and laying the ground work for government forcing solutions on us – not much else will come to benefit the crisis that the summit is being held to change. As The Heritage Foundation’s President, Edwin J. Feulner points out in this observation the organized system for tearing down the economy of the United States under the guise of saving the planet is more of the same without any real accomplishment on an international basis.
Of course tearing down the United States economy is really what this hoax is all about – paying those doing the destruction in the process. Scientist and politicians always appreciate more funding and in this case, on an international basis, one hand washes the other. Science gives license to government to overreach in expanding policy intrusion into all aspects of our lives. In return the enterprise of scientific study and “research” into climate change gets funded by government.
In the end, the points made by Ben Lieberman are absolutely correct that the U.S. should stay out of the accord, if one is to come from the Copenhagen session.
Posted by Doug Busselman at 12/4/2009 12:45 PM 
Categories: Global Warming
Tags: Copenhagen Climate Change Summit Global Warming Carbon Foot Print
Categories: Global Warming
Tags: Copenhagen Climate Change Summit Global Warming Carbon Foot Print
Comments